Bill C-215 Marine Liability Act
C-215 An Act to Amend the Marine Liability Act (National Strategy Respecting Pollution Caused By Shipping Container Spills)
Bill Type: Private Member’s Bill
Bill Sponsor: Gord Johns (Courtenay—Alberni)
Status: Outside the Order of Precedence — First Reading June 18, 2025. This Bill hasn't passed yet.
How would YOU vote? Scroll down to vote and comment below.
WHO GAINS POWER
- The Minister of Transport gains authority to develop and implement a national strategy on shipping container spill pollution
- The Minister controls the scope, timeline and content of the strategy
- The Minister decides what counts as "meaningful" collaboration with Indigenous organizations
- An independent study is commissioned — but the Minister controls when and how findings are acted on
- A joint spill response task force is established — but composition and authority are set by the Minister
WHO LOSES POWER
- Coastal communities, commercial fishers and Indigenous organizations have input rights but no veto or binding role
- Parliament receives reports but has no approval power over the strategy itself
- Provinces are named as task force participants but have no guaranteed decision-making authority
WHO GAINS MONEY
- Researchers studying microplastics, polystyrene and removal techniques — funding measures are included
- Potential future compensation fund for pollution damage from lost containers — evaluated but not guaranteed
WHO LOSES MONEY
- Shipping industry may face increased compliance costs if the strategy introduces new manifest requirements or spill prevention measures
- Taxpayers fund the independent study, annual reports and any compensation fund established
THE CATCH
- ⚠️ Canada already has a polluter-pays framework for oil spills — the Ship-source Oil Pollution Fund (SOPF) covers cleanup when polluters can't pay, and MARPOL sets international standards Canada follows. Shipping container spills — lost containers, microplastics, polystyrene debris — fall outside this framework entirely. No dedicated fund, no mandatory tracking, no national response strategy exists for container spills. This Bill orders a study. The gap remains open until a strategy is actually implemented.
- ⚠️ No binding timeline for the strategy itself — the Minister must table a report within one year, but the strategy can be developed on any schedule after that
- ⚠️ "Meaningful opportunity to collaborate" is not defined — the Minister determines what qualifies
- ⚠️ The compensation fund is only evaluated, not created — the Bill requires a study of its potential benefits, not its establishment
- ⚠️ No enforcement mechanism — the Bill creates reporting obligations but no penalties if the Minister fails to act