Bill C-258 R. v Jordan Supreme Court Decision

Read Full Bill Text Here

C-258 An Act to Amend the Criminal Code to Address the Supreme Court of Canada Decision in R. v. Jordan

Bill Type: Private Member’s Bill

Bill Sponsor: Rhéal Éloi Fortin (Rivière-du-Nord)

Status: Outside the Order of Precedence — 1st Reading December 3, 2025. This Bill hasn't passed yet.

How would YOU vote? Scroll down to vote and comment below.

WHO GAINS POWER

  • Accused persons gain a codified right to have their case stayed (dismissed) if trial takes too long — 30 months for superior court, 18 months for provincial court
  • This writes the Supreme Court's 2016 R. v. Jordan decision directly into the Criminal Code, giving it statutory force rather than relying on case law alone

WHO LOSES POWER

  • Prosecutors lose the ability to let cases drag on indefinitely — once the ceiling is hit, the case must be stayed unless they can prove exceptional circumstances
  • Courts lose discretion to allow delays beyond the ceiling without justification

WHO GAINS MONEY

  • No direct financial provisions in this Bill

WHO LOSES MONEY

  • No direct financial provisions, though stayed proceedings mean prosecution costs already spent are lost with no conviction

THE CATCH

  • ⚠️ The notwithstanding clause is invoked — subsection (4) exempts serious sexual offences (primary designated offenses) from the time ceilings entirely and the Bill explicitly declares this operates despite the Charter right to trial within a reasonable time
  • This means the most serious cases — where delays are often longest and stakes highest for the accused — have no ceiling at all
  • Defense-caused delays don't count toward the clock — but determining what counts as "defense delay" versus systemic delay is often contested in court
  • ⚠️ "Exceptional circumstances" is not defined in the Bill — prosecutors must argue it but the standard is left to judicial interpretation

Source: Bill C-258 — Parliament of Canada